Legal Opinion
League v. Vanice
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided October 18, 1985No. 84-399PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.
The district court for Lancaster County as an equity court held that six causes of action claimed by Daniel N. League against Kaer P. Vanice III, based on a corporate officer’s duty owed a shareholder, were barred by the statute of limitations in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-207(4) (Reissue 1979) and also dismissed a seventh and remaining cause of action based on alleged breach of duty by Vanice as League’s agent in the sále of the capital stock of Vanice Pontiac-Cadillac, Inc. (VPCI). We affirm in part and in part reverse and remand.
Initially, all capital stock of VPCI, an incorporated automobile…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
- Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
- Rosnick v. MarksNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Cohen v. Jenkintown Cab Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Sacchi v. BlodigNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Republic Insurance Co. v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Pamida, Inc. v. E.S. Originals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Georgetowne Ltd. Partnership v. Geotechnical Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- Succession of Smith v. Kavanaugh, Pierson & TalleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.