Legal Opinion

Genter v. Workforce Safety & Insurance Fund

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 2006No. 20060145PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Paul Genter appealed from a district court judgment affirming an order of Workforce Safety & Insurance (“WSI”) awarding partial disability benefits and requiring him to return to work part-time. Genter argues that WSI did not adequately consider his preexisting hearing loss in formulating his vocational rehabilitation plan. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In 1995, while working as an officer with the Burleigh County Sheriffs Department, Genter experienced chest pains that were later diagnosed as congestive heart failure. WSI accepted his claim and began paying total…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thompson v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Paul v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Svedberg v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKERS COMPENSATION BUREAUNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Hoffman v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Ziesch v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Swenson v. Workforce Safety & Insurance FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Tedford v. WORKFORCE SAFETY AND INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Drayton v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Bishop v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Shotbolt v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API