Legal Opinion

Nemec v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1996No. Civil 950208PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

Carol Nemec appeals from a district court judgment affirming the order of the North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau determining Nemec was not entitled to disability benefits after March 17,1992, and denying benefits for chiropractic care after July 17, 1992. We affirm.

I

In 1986, Nemec sustained a work-related injury in Minnesota to her neck, head, left arm, and left shoulder. Nemec received Minnesota workers compensation benefits and had certain work limitations as a result of her 1986 injuries.

Nemec moved to North Dakota and, in January 1992, was hired as a cook for 32…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation SurvivorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Lyng v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Atkins v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Beckler v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Berg v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Gregory v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Sprunk v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Frohlich v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Bruns v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API