Legal Opinion

Stenvold v. WORKFORCE SAFETY & INSURANCE

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 2006No. 20050344PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Cindy Stenvold has appealed from a district court judgment affirming an order of Workforce Safety and Insurance (‘WSI”) denying her further disability benefits. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On June 1, 2000, Stenvold injured her left heel while working as a service station attendant and cashier. Stenvold was subsequently diagnosed with plantar fasciitis and a heel spur. In November 2000, Stenvold submitted a claim for workers compensation benefits. WSI accepted the claim and awarded medical and disability benefits.

[¶ 3] In April 2001, Stenvold began receiving vocational…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKERS COMPENSATION BUREAUNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Victor v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Benson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Ziesch v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Miller v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. WORKFORCE SAFETY & INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Shotbolt v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Frith v. SafetyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Anderson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Anderson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API