Stenvold v. WORKFORCE SAFETY & INSURANCE
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Cindy Stenvold has appealed from a district court judgment affirming an order of Workforce Safety and Insurance (‘WSI”) denying her further disability benefits. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On June 1, 2000, Stenvold injured her left heel while working as a service station attendant and cashier. Stenvold was subsequently diagnosed with plantar fasciitis and a heel spur. In November 2000, Stenvold submitted a claim for workers compensation benefits. WSI accepted the claim and awarded medical and disability benefits.
[¶ 3] In April 2001, Stenvold began receiving vocational…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lewis v. NORTH DAKOTA WORKERS COMPENSATION BUREAUNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Victor v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Benson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Ziesch v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Miller v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Industrial Contractors, Inc. v. WORKFORCE SAFETY & INSURANCENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Shotbolt v. North Dakota Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Frith v. SafetyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Anderson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Anderson v. Workforce Safety & InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.