Legal Opinion

State v. Caron

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 1975No. 68PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

Defendant first assigns as error the denial of his motions for judgment as of nonsuit at the close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence. It is elementary that a motion to nonsuit requires the trial court to consider the evidence in its light most favorable to the State, take it as true, and give the State the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. State v. Goines, 273 N.C. 509, 160 S.E. 2d *469469 (1968), and cases cited therein. Regardless of whether the evidence is direct, circumstantial, or both, if there is evidence from which a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. PhiferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API