State v. . Barnhill
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.
The witness Chancey was asked, “Right when the man was hit, if anybody had come there and said they hit him, wouldn’t that have made an impression on your mind?” The State objected to this question; the court sustained the objection and defendant excepted, and this was the first assignment of error. We think the defendant’s exception cannot be sustained; if the court was in error the defendant waived it by the question immediately being put in another form and answered without objection: “Do you think your mind was in such a condition that that would not have made an impression on you? A. I…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- State v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- State v. . BoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- State v. KincaidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- State v. . SearsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1867
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . SteeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.