Legal Opinion

Sorrells v. . Decker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

Tbe only exceptions noted at tbe trial and brought forward in tbe assignments of error relate to tbe judge’s charge to tbe jury. Tbe portions excepted to contained statements of tbe contentions of tbe parties and tbe evidence supporting. If there were any inadvertence on tbe part of tbe judge in these recitals, bis attention should have been called to it at tbe time so that correction, if deemed important, might have been made. S. v. Sinodis, 189 N. C., 565; S. v. Barnhill, 186 N. C., 446. Tbe controversy presented issues of fact which have been resolved against tbe defendant., In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. . BarnhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. State v. . BowserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. State v. . ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Acceptance Corp. v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Bailey v. HaymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API