Sorrells v. . Decker
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
Tbe only exceptions noted at tbe trial and brought forward in tbe assignments of error relate to tbe judge’s charge to tbe jury. Tbe portions excepted to contained statements of tbe contentions of tbe parties and tbe evidence supporting. If there were any inadvertence on tbe part of tbe judge in these recitals, bis attention should have been called to it at tbe time so that correction, if deemed important, might have been made. S. v. Sinodis, 189 N. C., 565; S. v. Barnhill, 186 N. C., 446. Tbe controversy presented issues of fact which have been resolved against tbe defendant., In…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. . BarnhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
3Cited by8 opinions
- Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. . BowserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. . ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Acceptance Corp. v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Bailey v. HaymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.