Legal Opinion

State v. Strickland

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 1961No. 436PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, C.J.

The defendant brings forward twelve assignments of error. However only one is supported by an exception and set out in his brief. The remaining eleven are deemed abandoned. Rule 28 of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, at page 562.

An assignment of error must be based upon an exception duly taken, in apt time, during the trial and preserved as required by the Rules of this Court. Rules 19 (3) and 21. See 221 N.C. 544, supra, and S. v. Moore, 222 N.C. 356, 23 S.E. 2d 31.

Exceptions in the record not set out in the appellant's brief, or in support of which no reason or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. State v. HarrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. . WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  4. State v. HumblesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. StevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Knutton v. CofieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. CradleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API