Legal Opinion
Teamsters Local 312 v. Matlack, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 8, 1997No. 96-1268PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Chief Judge.
This appeal presents the issue of the appropriate procedure to be used by the district court when it concludes that there were fundamental procedural irregularities in the course of an arbitration hearing between parties to a collective bargaining agreement.
I
A
Historical Facts
Teamsters Local 312, affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, AFL-CIO, (“Local 312” or “the Union”) is the certified bargaining unit for truck drivers and haulers operating in the Bensalem, Pennsylvania waste water transportation terminal of appellee Matlack,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Iron Workers Local 272 v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Newark Stereotypers' Union No. 18 v. Newark Morning Ledger Co., and Newark Newspaper Publishers' AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Century Indemnity Co. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Daniel v. Green v. Ameritech Corporation and Ameritech Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Brentwood Medical Associates v. United Mine Workers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- PG Publishing Co v. Newspaper Guild of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Whitehead Ex Rel. Estate of Whitehead v. Pullman Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.