Legal Opinion
Roth v. Rhodes
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 1994No. G013651PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RYLAARSDAM, J. *
May operators of medical buildings limit acceptable tenants to medical doctors or do statutory or common law prohibitions require them to lease space to other health care practitioners, in this instance, a podiatrist, or even the world at large? We conclude under the facts presented here, no legal requirement compels landlords to accept tenants who are not medical doctors.
Respondents Frank A. Rhodes, Gene Rhodes, Susan Rhodes, Rhodes Development Company, and Newport Center Medical Buildings (Rhodes or the Rhodes respondents) operate medical buildings in Newport Beach.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare System, LPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Theme Promotions, Inc. v. News America Marketing FSICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Dube v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Prilliman v. United Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.