Legal Opinion

People v. Ayhens

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 1911No. Crim. No. 321PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. ;Wm. S. Wells, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.

The defendant, jointly with one Charles Miller, was charged with the crime of burglary. He was convicted, upon a separate trial, of burglary in the first degree, and sentenced to fifteen years in the state’s prison at San Quentin.

The testimony of the arresting officer with reference to a conversation which he had with the codefendant Miller at the time of the arrest and not in the presence of the defendant was not objected to at the trial, and the error in the ad-' mission of this testimony cannot now be considered.

Shortly after the commission of the burglary Police Officer Frank Anderson,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. People v. AmayaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. People v. MayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. LaparaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hahn v. Citizens State BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  5. People v. EganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API