Legal Opinion

People v. Cole

California Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1903No. Crim. No. 1025PublishedCited by 52 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. F. H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.—

Defendant was convicted of grand larceny, and appeals from the judgment and order denying him a new trial.

1. The defendant was in the employ of the Indianapolis Furniture Company’s store, in the city of San Francisco, in the capacity of assistant shipping clerk, and occasionally made sales for his employer. The evidence introduced by the prosecution tended to show that on the morning of March 19, 1901, at about half-past six o’clock, the defendant at the back door of said store delivered to one Burke ten rolls of carpet belonging to the Indianapolis Furniture Company, of the value of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. TesharaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. O'Callaghan v. BodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. People v. PhilbonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. People v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. People v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. People v. KimbleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API