Roylance v. Doelger
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
In this liability insurance litigation defendant (certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, hereinafter called Lloyds) filed an answer together with a cross-complaint seeking declaratory relief and naming as cross-defend ants new third parties. The trial court granted the motion of such new parties to strike the cross-complaint, and defendant appeals. We have concluded that striking of the cross-complaint was erroneous under the circumstances, and that the order appealed from should be reversed.
Plaintiff corporation, against whom a judgment of $5,116.07 for property damages had been rendered in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Winter v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Sattinger v. NewbauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Atherley v. MacDonald, Young & Nelson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- E. L. White, Inc. v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Herrero v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- River Garden Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.