Legal Opinion

State v. Waddell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 18, 1973No. 5PublishedCited by 142 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUSKINS, Justice.

We overrule defendant’s assignments of error based on denial of his motions for nonsuit and to set aside the verdict. The evidence is overwhelmingly sufficient to carry the case to the jury and to support the verdict. Likewise, defendant’s third assignment addressed to the charge has no merit and cannot be sustained. The court’s charge on circumstantial evidence is free from prejudicial error. We therefore put aside these assignments without discussion and go directly to the constitutional question raised by defendant and argued in the briefs.

Defendant contends that the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by142 opinions

  1. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API