Legal Opinion

Williams v. Provident Investment Counsel, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 15, 2003No. 3:02CV7548PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARR, District Judge.

This is a suit by the trustees of the Toledo Area Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan and Trust (the “Plan”) to recover monies allegedly lost through the failure of the defendant Provident Investment Counsel, Inc. (“Provident”) to fulfill its fiduciary duties as the Plan’s investment manager. Provident, contending that the other fiduciaries of the Plan are also liable for any alleged losses, has filed a counterclaim against the trustees and a third-party complaint against the trustees’ investment consultants, Midwest Continental Company (“Midwest”) and Jeffrey Barefoot.

P…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Charters v. John Hancock Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
  2. HCRI TRS ACQUIRER, LLC v. IwerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
  3. Openshaw v. Cohen, Klingenstein & Marks, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  4. Tittle v. Enron Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
  5. Gilbert v. National Employee Benefit Companies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API