Legal Opinion
Openshaw v. Cohen, Klingenstein & Marks, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 3, 2004No. CIV.A. WDQ03-1838PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
QUARLES, District Judge.
Pending are Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss Defendant’s Counterclaim, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim, With Respect to Affirmative Defenses, and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. For the following reasons, the Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaim and the Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses will be granted and the Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. Background
Plaintiffs are trustees of the Severance & Annuity Plan and Pension Plan of The…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dann v. Lincoln National Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Teets v. Great-West Life & Annuity InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016
- Tittle v. Enron Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
- Classen Immunotherapies, Inc. v. King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005
- Prudential Retirement Insurance v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.