Parr v. Cloutier
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
The plaintiffs Cecilia and Frank Parr, husband and wife, commenced this action to recover damages occasioned by the alleged negligent operation by defendant Philip Farbo of an automobile owned by his employer Arthur Cloutier, d. b. a. Fred’s Cab. The matter was tried to a jury which returned its special verdict finding defendants 60% causally negligent and plaintiff Cecilia Parr 40% causally negligent and assessing plaintiffs’ damages in the aggregate of $17,685. Thereafter, the trial court denied plaintiffs’ alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Fitzer v. BloomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- LeMay v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Fifer v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Sandt v. HylenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wallace v. Tri-State Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Thompson v. HillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Pulkrabek v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Texas Commerce Bank v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Casper v. City of StacyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.