Legal Opinion

Conklin v. Woody

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1917No. Civ. No. 1839PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.

Appeal from a judgment directing the issuance of a mandate against the defendant requiring him, as auditor of the county of Kern, to draw a warrant in favor of the petitioner in payment for services and certain expenses incurred as described in the demand of petitioner filed and approved by the board of supervisors of said Kern County.

On the second day of March, 1915, the board of supervisors of Kern County, by more than a two-thirds’ vote, adopted the following resolution:

“It appearing to the satisfaction of the board that the communication delivered to this hoard on the 10th day of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. County of Modoc v. SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gallarno v. LongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  2. Gibson v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. Eckart v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Graham v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Collins v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API