Legal Opinion

Davisson v. Faucher

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1951No. Civ. 17682PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, J. pro tem.

The basic question here presented is whether purchasers after having entered into a written executory contract with a seller absolving the latter from liability for alleged prior false representations and promises made to induce the purchase of two houses may after giving notice of rescission of that contract, sue and recover for all damages accruing to the purchasers both prior and subsequent to the written contract.

Originally the parties entered into an oral contract by the terms of which the defendant agreed not only to sell two houses she owned to the plaintiffs, but to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. De La Beckwith v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Davis v. Rite-Lite Sales Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Eckart v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Waldman Produce, Inc. v. Frigidaire Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1935

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Clark Equipment Co. v. WheatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Bringas v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Fanucchi & Limi Farms v. United Agri ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Flash Cleaners, Inc. v. Columbia Appliance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Garetto v. Almaden VineyardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API