Attorney Grievance Commission v. Robaton
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, J.
The Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland (“Petitioner”), acting through Bar Counsel and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751(a), 1 filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action against David M. Robaton, Respondent. On August 22, 2008, Bar Counsel charged Respondent with violating the following Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”): 1.1 (Competence), 2 1.3 (Diligence), 3 3.3(a)(1) (Candor Toward the Tribunal), 4 5.5(a) (Unauthorized Practice of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice), 5 and 8.4(c) and (d) (Misconduct). 6 Pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-752(a), 7 we re ferred the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. UgwuonyeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- In Re Karl H.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SteinhornCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. LitmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.