In Re Karl H.

In In re Damon M., 362 Md. 429, 438, 765 A.2d 624, 628 (2001), this Court held that, if a permanency plan for reunification is amended or modified to a permanency plan for adoption, long-term care, or permanent foster care, it is an immediately appealable order. The question now before this Court is, if at the initial “permanency planning hearing,” 1 the trial court ordered a concurrent permanency plan which provided for the pursuit of both reunification and adoption, whether that order establishing the permanency plan is immediately appealable. 2 We hold that a concurrent permanency plan…