Rankin v. Naftalis
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
Dr. J. M. Naftalis, Dr. R. D. Martin, Gene S. Friedman, and E. F. Lisle filed suit against Robert E. Rankin seeking to impress a constructive trust upon an oil and gas lease that he took in his name. The defendant, Rankin, pleaded in defense, that plaintiffs’ claim was barred by the Statute of Frauds, the Statute of Conveyances, and the Texas Trust Act. Rankin also defended on the grounds that plaintiffs were es-topped to assert their claim in equity. After a jury trial, the court rendered judgment that the plaintiffs take nothing, but the court of civil appeals with one justice…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Thigpen v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Omohundro v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Meadows v. BierschwaleTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Johnson v. PeckhamTexas Supreme Court · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Joe v. Two Thirty Nine Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Norman v. Apache Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Blue Bell, Inc. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Medford v. MedfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Cass v. Stephens, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.