Legal Opinion

Thigpen v. Locke

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1962No. A-8908PublishedCited by 461 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Justice.

This is a suit to set aside two deeds exe- - cuted by Mr. and Mrs. Robert C. Locke-(plaintiffs) by which they conveyed title to • a Flouston lot and grocery store to J. W. Thigpen (defendant). The trial court instructed verdict for Thigpen, and the Court: *249of Civil Appeals has reversed and remanded. 353 S.W.2d 249. Thigpen is petitioner here

Respondents’ theory is that the first deed is void because intended as a mortgage on 'business homestead property. Since petitioner does not rely on this deed, it need not he considered.

As to the second deed, dated January 2, 1951,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fitz-Gerald v. HullTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Courseview, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Mills v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Pope v. GarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Indemnity Insurance v. W. L. Macatee & SonsTexas Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by461 opinions

  1. In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. and Brien Garcia v. Nury ChapaTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. S.V. v. R.V.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. SwansonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998

456 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API