Legal Opinion

Omohundro v. Matthews

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1960No. A-7115PublishedCited by 184 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenhill

Frank D. Matthews, Jr., and Ray James Thompson, Jr., brought suit against E. G. Omohundro to recover an undivided l/3rd interest each in a l/16th overriding royalty interest which Omohundro acquired from Slick Oil Corporation. The trial court decreed that a constructive trust existed in favor of Matthews and Thompson to the interests they claimed. The Court of Civil Appeals has affirmed that judgment. 317 S.W. 2d 771. We here affirm those judgments.

The record shows that Omohundro learned of the possibility of obtaining an assignment (commonly called a “farmout”) from Humble Oil and Refining…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Fitz-Gerald v. HullTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Sanders v. HarderTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Smith v. BolinTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. MacDonald v. FollettTexas Supreme Court · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by184 opinions

  1. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Gaines v. HammanTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Hoggett v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  5. Bocanegra v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980

179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API