Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Peckham

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1938No. 7205PublishedCited by 167 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Hickman,

of the Commission of Appeals, delivered the opinion for the Court.

A full and clear statement of the case was made in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, reported in 98 S. W. (2d) 408. That court reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause for another trial. Since we have concluded that it entered the correct judgment, and that the case must be retried, it is not thought that a full restatement is necessary or desirable in this opinion.

Peckham and Johnson were operating two oil and gas leases, owning equal shares in the leases and sharing equally…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Peckham v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Thompson v. DuncanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Griffin v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Savage v. RHEATexas Commission of Appeals · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by167 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. SwansonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Crim Truck & Tractor Co. v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Insurance Co. of North America v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1998

162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API