Medford v. Medford

OPINION

TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.

Introduction

Appellant Roger Dale Medford (“Roger”) and his brother appellee William Ralph Medford (“William”) both sought summary judgments in Roger’s suit for a division of rental income from a house the brothers share as tenants in common. In three issues on appeal, Roger contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for summary judgment, denied his motion for continuance to conduct discovery, and granted William’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse and remand.

Background

When the parties’ father died in 1990, he left a will granting…