Biurrun v. Elizalde
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion of defendant Ramirez for a nonsuit.
The action is for money had and received. The plaintiff testified: “On -the twenty-sixth day of December, 1919, I had business dealings with the defendant Elizalde. . . . Defendant Ramirez was present at that time. I offered to let Mr. Elizalde run my sheep until he could sell them, and agreed with him that I would pay him $2,176 as expenses for running them, and when he sold the sheep he was to pay me $8 per head and beep for himself all that he received over that sum. ... I had 728…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Freese v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Heydenfeldt v. JacobsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- First Nat'l Bank of Modesto v. WakefieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Smith v. Farmers' and Merchants' BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Biurrun v. ElizaldeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Lynch v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Lich v. CarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Lich v. CarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960