Irvine v. MacGregor
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
This is an appeal from judgment in favor of plaintiffs in an action to recover an alleged sum of money due them as an additional royalty or bonus under the provisions of an oil lease.
Plaintiffs, owners of certain real property, entered into a written agreement with defendants MacGregor and Simmel, leasing their land to these parties for oil drilling purposes. About two weeks later said lease was assigned by the last mentioned defendants to defendants Lewis, Underwood, and MacGregor as trustees for “MacGregor Syndicate No. 1.”
Tbe provision of the lease under which recovery is sought reads as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Noble v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Kreutz v. LivingstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Smith v. Farmers' and Merchants' BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Freitas v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
3Cited by7 opinions
- Galdjie v. DarwishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Morgan v. VeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Graven v. BackusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Transport Oil Co. v. Exeter Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
- Purdy v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.