Legal Opinion

Olson v. Gay

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 14, 1933No. Docket No. 4956PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PULLEN, P. J.—This

is an appeal by defendant from a judgment in an action brought by plaintiff against him as the driver of an automobile. The injuries sustained were the result of a collision, and defendant is charged by plaintiff with wilful misconduct in the operation of his car.

At the time of the collision plaintiff was a guest of defendant, and the single issue here presented is whether the accident and injuries sustained by plaintiff were the direct and proximate result of wilful misconduct on the part of defendant, as that term is defined in section 141¾ of the California Vehicle Act.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Helme v. Great Western Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Walker v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Nelson v. WestergaardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Porter v. HofmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Norton v. PuterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Parsons v. FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Fiske v. WilkieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. McLeod v. DuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API