Legal Opinion

Howard v. Howard

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 19, 1933No. Docket No. 1229PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff based upon a fourth amended complaint charging wilful misconduct on the part of the defendant. Plaintiff, who lived in Visalia with her two sons, Homer C. Howard and Sammie Howard, had gone to Santa Cruz on November 10, 1931. On the evening of that day, the two boys started from Visalia to join their mother at Santa Cruz, it being conceded that Sammie was riding as the guest of his brother in his automobile. It was raining or sprinkling and the pavement was wet. As they reached the outskirts of Visalia, near a point where a paved…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Helme v. Great Western Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Farwell v. RaddinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Tighe v. DiamondOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Cope v. DavisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Weber v. PinyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API