Legal Opinion
Parsons v. Fuller
California Supreme Court
Decided March 26, 1937No. L. A. 16102PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
A transfer of this cause from the District Court of Appeal was ordered solely for the reason that there was a possible conflict between the opinion therein and the two cases of McLeod v. Dutton, 13 Cal. App. (2d) 545 [57 Pac. (2d) 189], and Hall v. Mazzei, 14 Cal. App. (2d) 48 [57 Pac. (2d) 948]. We have made a further study of those two cases, and conclude that neither of them conflicts with the opinion of the District Court of Appeal in the present cause. In each of those cases it was sought to hold the driver of the ear for injury to a guest riding with the driver. In the case of McLeod v.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Helme v. Great Western Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Turner v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Cowgill, Adm'r v. Boock, Adm'rOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Cope v. DavisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Haft v. Lone Palm HotelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.