Legal Opinion

Walker v. Bacon

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1933No. Docket No. 1237PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREWS, J., pro tem.

The essential facts developed on trial are: That both parties were employees of Fresno County, defendant a traffic officer, plaintiff a visiting nurse. Both had reason to go out of town on business connected with their work. Defendant invited plaintiff to ride with him and he would go first to the place he was to visit and then take her to the place she must go. The road at the place of the accident was paved with bitumen to the width of sixteen feet with dirt shoulders two or three feet wide on each side, making the width about twenty-two feet in all. It is described as…

2Cited by34 opinions

  1. Cope v. DavisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Gallegher v. DavisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1936
  3. Porter v. HofmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Turner v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Norton v. PuterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API