Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Romley v. Hutt
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 23, 1999No. 1 CA-SA 99-0146PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge.
¶ 1 This special action arises out of a request by Real Party in Interest Robin Treen (defendant) to interview victim James Hickey (Hickey). The trial court ordered the interview, and the state challenges the order as violative of the Victims’ Bill of Rights. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz.Rev.Stat. Ann. (A.R.S.) § 12~120.21(A)(4). For the following reasons, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL . HISTORY
¶2 James T. Hickey, a member of the State Bar of Arizona, served as attorney for Larry Treen1 (Treen) until December 15, 1997 when…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- King v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Southwest Gas Corp. v. IRWIN EX REL. COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Romley v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Demarce v. WillrichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- State ex rel. Wangberg v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.