Legal Opinion
O'BRIEN v. Escher
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided August 2, 2003No. 2 CA-SA 2003-0008, 2 CA-SA 2003-0015PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In these consolidated special actions, petitioners Jeremy Sean O’Brien and April Luette Stockton ask us to decide whether the November 2002 amendment by referendum of A.R.S. § 13-901.01(E), which allows a criminal defendant convicted of a “Proposition 200” offense to be incarcerated under certain circumstances, may be applied retroactively to a defendant whose offense was committed before November 25, 2002, the effective date of the amendment, see article IV, pt. 1, § 1(5), Ariz. Const., but who violated the conditions of probation after that date. The…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fragoso v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Scott Douglas Nordstrom v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- People v. RussellColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.