Legal Opinion
Shulansky v. Cambridge-Newport Financial Services Corp.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 24, 1992No. File 703490PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAurigemma, J.
This is an action to enforce an administrative subpoena issued on July 14,1992, by the state banking commissioner (commissioner) pursuant to General Statutes § 36-495. The documents requested under subpoena were sought in conjunction with an investigation commenced by the commissioner to determine whether the defendant had violated or was about to violate the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act (CUSA), General Statutes § 36-470 et seq.
The defendant is not licensed by the commissioner to sell securities in Connecticut. The commissioner subpoenaed, among other things, “copies of all…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,017 Securities and Exchange Commission, and Cross-Appellant v. Brigadoon Scotch Distributing Co., and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shulansky v. RodriguezConnecticut Superior Court · 1994
- Hartford County Sheriffs Department Communities Charities Ass'n v. BlumenthalConnecticut Superior Court · 2001
- Connecticut National Bank v. GiacomiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Hartford County Sheriffs v. Blumenthal, No. Cv00-0093035-S (Jul. 31, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001