Legal Opinion
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,017 Securities and Exchange Commission, and Cross-Appellant v. Brigadoon Scotch Distributing Co., and Cross-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 7, 1973No. 832-835, Dockets 73-1395 and 73-1444 to 73-1446PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:
On January 26, 1972, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) applied to the district court for the Southern District of New York for an order pursuant to section 22(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77v(b), and section 21(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78u(c), directing compliance with subpoenas duces tecum issued to Brigadoon Scotch Distributing Co. (“Brigadoon”), Mil-bank Trading Co., Inc. (“Milbank”), and Leith-Moor Scotch Whisky Co. (“Leith-Moor”). The district court in two memorandum decisions and an order, which was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- United States v. Construction Products Research, Inc. Five Star Products, Inc. And H. Nash BabcockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Calvin D. RahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Heslin v. Connecticut Law Clinic of Trantolo & TrantoloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- United States v. University Hospital, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Parents of Baby Jane Doe, Intervenors-Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.