Legal Opinion

Hartford County Sheriffs v. Blumenthal, No. Cv00-0093035-S (Jul. 31, 2001)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 31, 2001No. Nos. CV00-0093035-S; CV00-0093202-S; CV00-0092528; CV00-0092936-S; CV00-0093248-S; CV00-0093389-S; CV00-0092504-S; CV00-0092577-S; CV00-0093517-S; CV00-0093552-SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

The Attorney General of Connecticut (the defendant), hereinafter Attorney General, pursuant to information provided his office, caused various subpoena duces tecum requesting various documents to be served upon the following entities (and in some instances their respective banking institutions): The Court Sheriff's Department Community Charities Association, Inc., Edward B. Glanz, President; Deputy Sheriff of Fairfield County George F. Hammel; Deputy Sheriff of Fairfield County Ronald Z. Kadar;…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API