Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Connecticut National Bank v. Giacomi

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 22, 1997No. SC 15539Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBerdon, J.

The trial court found that the plaintiff, Connecticut National Bank, is barred from pursuing these actions against the defendants because it violated the provisions of the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act (CUSA), General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 36-470 et. seq.1 More specifically, the trial court found that the plaintiff was barred from bringing actions to collect on *75promissory notes made by the defendants in order to finance their purchases of units in the Great Rings Limited Partnership (Great Rings) because the plaintiff acted as an agent of the seller who perpetrated the fraud. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Shulansky v. Cambridge-Newport Financial Services Corp.Connecticut Superior Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API