Griffin v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The petitioner, Arthur Griffin, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the respondent, the commissioner of correction, denied him ninety-seven days of jail credit, which should have been applied by virtue of a revised mittimus to sentences imposed in the judicial district of Fairfield (Fairfield sentences). He claims that the court erred in concluding that General Statutes § 18-98d 1 did not permit the respondent to apply the ninety-seven days of credit to his Fairfield sentences…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Harris v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Mead v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Commissioner of Correction v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Griffin v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Griffin v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Perez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- State v. Eric L.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2024