Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 21, 2010No. AC 31298PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEACH, J.

The petitioner, Arthur Griffin, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the respondent, the commissioner of correction, denied him ninety-seven days of jail credit, which should have been applied by virtue of a revised mittimus to sentences imposed in the judicial district of Fairfield (Fairfield sentences). He claims that the court erred in concluding that General Statutes § 18-98d 1 did not permit the respondent to apply the ninety-seven days of credit to his Fairfield sentences…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Harris v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. Mead v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. Commissioner of Correction v. GordonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Griffin v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Griffin v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. Perez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
  5. State v. Eric L.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API