Commissioner of Correction v. Gordon
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the intended aggregate sentence imposed by the trial court or the mittimus controls an incarcerated person’s total effective sentence. The plaintiff in error, the commissioner of correction (commissioner), brings a writ of error challenging the decision of the habeas court, Sferrazza, J., that reduced the total aggregate sentence of the defendant in error, Horatio Gordon (petitioner), from fifteen to thirteen years imprisonment. We reverse the decision of the habeas court.
It is undisputed that, on February 3,1986, the state and the petitioner…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kuhlmann v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hill v. United States Ex Rel. WamplerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Lozada v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. DenyaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- White v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Griffin v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.