Legal Opinion

Smith v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 9, 2018No. AC38769PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtElgo, J.

The petitioner, Tremaine Smith, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he alleged ineffective assistance on the part of his trial counsel in advising him on presentence confinement credit during a plea proceeding. The dispositive issue is whether the habeas court abused its discretion in so doing. We conclude that it did not and, accordingly, dismiss the appeal.

The following factual and procedural history is relevant to our resolution of this appeal. On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Narcisse v. Commissioner of Mental Health & Addiction ServicesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API