Legal Opinion

Mead v. Commissioner of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 8, 2007No. SC 17632PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SULLIVAN, J.

The petitioner, Harold W. Mead, appeals 1 from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims on appeal that the habeas court improperly concluded that General Statutes § 53a-35b, 2 which defines a sentence of life imprisonment as a definite sentence of sixty years, does not apply retroactively to persons who committed crimes prior to that statute’s enactment. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

The record reveals the following facts and procedural history. On March 8, 1971, the petitioner was indicted on…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. Holmquist v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  4. State v. NowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Tyson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Castonguay v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. Dickinson v. MullaneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. State v. Nathaniel S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  4. State v. BischoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  5. State v. CobosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API