Legal Opinion

Kingfisher Improvement Co. v. Talley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1915No. 3737PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from District Court, Comanche County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by the Kingfisher Improvement Company, a corporation, against Marie B. Talley and Geo. B. Stites. Judgment for defendant Talley, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

This suit was instituted July 3, 1903, in the district court of Comanche county by the Kingfisher Improvement Company, as plaintiff, against Marie B. Talley and another, to recover certain lots in the town of Waurika. The defendant Talley filed an answer, consisting: (1) Of a general denial; and (2) she averred, in substance, that on or about the 18th day of June, 1902, she entered into a contract in writing with the improvement company, in which it agreed to convey the lots in controversy to her by warranty deed, in consideration that she should, within ten days…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Oklahoma City Electric, Gas & Power Co. v. BaumhoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Harding v. GillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Prince v. GosnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Metropolitan Ry. Co. v. FonvilleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Baker v. VadderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Norton v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Lamb v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. LambSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. ColeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API