Legal Opinion

Baker v. Vadder

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 27, 1921No. 10303PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; J. C. Robberts, Judge. Action by Edward Baker against Emma Vadder to vacate judgment of partition. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtPitchford, J.

This action was brought by E. H. Baker, as plaintiff, in the district court of Kingfisher county, Oklahoma, against Emma Vadder, as defendant, seeking to have vacated a decree rendered in the district court of said county, on the 30th day of June, 1916, in cause No. 1425, in. which Emma Vadder, as plaintiff, filed a petition in partition against E. H. Baker and others for the purpose of having determined the interests of plaintiff and defendants in and to the S. W. quarter of section 15, in township 18 N., range 5 W. I. M. Judgment was rendered in said cause finding that Emma Vadder was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alfrey v. ColbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Norton v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Eastwood v. ClinkscalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Kingfisher Improvement Co. v. TalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Smith v. BraleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Underside v. LathropSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Tiger v. DrumrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Ross v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Clement v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  5. Sarkeys v. INDEPENDENT SCH. DIST. NO. 40, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API