Legal Opinion

Prince v. Gosnell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 1915No. 5901PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Error from District Court, Tillman County; Frank Mathews, Judge. Action by R. L. Gosnell against J. E. Prince. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

Defendant in error, plaintiff- below, R. L. Gosnell, brought ejectment against J. E. Prince, on October 25, 1907, for a certain lot in the town of Frederick, and on November 10, 1909, amended answer was filed in said suit, and thereafter a reply and rejoinder were filed. On January 12, 1913, trial was commenced, and after the introduction of testimony the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff for possession of the lot, and submitted to the jury the question of damages for detention of the possession thereof. In his amended answer defendant alleged that the plaintiff, through an agent,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of El Reno v. Cleveland-Trinidad Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Hardy, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. McDuffie v. Geiser Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Farmers' State Bank of Arkansas City v. StephensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Baker v. LeavittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Ely Walker Dry Goods Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Corrugated Culvert Co. v. Simpson Tp., McIntosh Cty.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Haven v. TrammellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Tackett v. TackettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API