Legal Opinion
Norton v. Kelley
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 11, 1916No. 6618PublishedCited by 19 opinions
Error from District Court, Seminole County; Tom D. McKeown, Judge. Action by Peggy Kelley against Sam Norton. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
COLLIER, C.
This is an action brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error to set aside and cancel a deed upon the land described in the petition. Hereinafter the parties Will be designated as they were in the trial court.
The defendant in his answer, among other defenses, pleads:
“That on the 1st day of February, 1912, in the case of Peggy Jackson v. Sam Norton, in the district court of Seminole county, Okla., the matter in controversy in this action was fully litigated and determined between said plaintiff and defendant, that a judgment in said 'cause was then and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Prince v. GosnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Farmers' State Bank of Arkansas City v. StephensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Alfrey v. ColbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Engle v. LeggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Sperry Oil & Gas Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Baker v. VadderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Kiniry v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.