Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Ry. Co. v. Fonville

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 14, 1912No. 1636PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from District-Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by Mrs. E. P. Eonville against the Metropolitan Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

Mrs. F. P. Fonville, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought an action in the district court of Oklahoma county, prior to statehood, against the Metropolitan Railway Company, hereinafter called defendant, for damages for personal injuries. She recovered a judgment, and defendant appealed to the Supreme Court of Oklahoma Territory. There the judgment of the district court was reversed, and the cause remanded. The opinion of the Supreme Court of the territory in the case is reported in 19 Okla. 283, 91 Pac. 902.

The case was again tried, and plaintiff again recovered judgment.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Independent Cotton Oil Co. v. BeachamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Oklahoma City Electric, Gas & Power Co. v. BaumhoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Coyle v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Pacific Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Clark v. St. L. & S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Kingfisher Improvement Co. v. TalleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Powell v. United Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Marth v. Kingfisher Commercial ClubSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API