Gillespie v. Ormsby
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.
In this action for breach of contract, with a cross-complaint raising issues of fraud and misrepresentations, plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment.
By his amended complaint, plaintiff sought damages based on defendant’s alleged breach of a contract relating to the drilling of an oil well known as the Fitzhugh-Wilhite No. 10 (hereinafter referred to as Well No. 10). Plaintiff alleged that he had substantially complied with all the terms of the agreement and that defendant had failed to contribute his agreed share of the drilling costs. Defendant’s answer included as an affirmative defense…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Lloyd v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- The Edward Barron Estate Co. v. the Woodruff Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Rogers v. WardenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Stevens v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Twing v. SchottWyoming Supreme Court · 1959
- Williams v. WraxallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Susanoil, Inc. v. Continental Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.