Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Warden

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1942No. L. A. 17882PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing an action after the court had sustained without leave to amend a general demurrer to plaintiff’s third amended complaint.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff, a widow without business experience, was the owner in fee of the mineral rights in two described lots; that she did not know that she was the owner of these rights; that the defendants, knowing of her inexperience and ignorance, entered into a conspiracy to cheat and defraud the plaintiff and to secure her interest in the lots for defendants C. P. Warden and Grace P. Warden. It is alleged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Sullivan v. HelbingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. American Trust Co. v. California Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Robins v. HopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Pohl v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Atascadero v. Merill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Warner Construction Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Finch v. Hughes Aircraft Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API