Legal Opinion

Corcoran v. Fitzgerald Bros.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 20, 1953No. 35,910PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

Certiorari to the industrial commission to review a decision denying compensation to an employee.

The facts are not in dispute. Relator, a student at the University of Minnesota, was employed as a laborer by Fitzgerald Brothers during the summer vacation. Fitzgerald Brothers were engaged in the construction of a new hippodrome building on the Minnesota state fair grounds. In order to protect the property of the contractor, a ten-foot wire mesh fence with barbed wire around the top was constructed around the project. Gates for ingress and egress were provided at the northeast…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  2. Olson v. Trinity Lodge No. 282, A. F. A. M.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. General Steel Castings Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Lienau v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wiley Manufacturing Co. v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Johannsen v. ACTION CONSTRUCTION CO. INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Goff v. Farmers Union Accounting Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Starrett v. Pier FoundrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Henville v. Southwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API